Distinction without a difference
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
top
Look up
distinction without a difference
in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists.cite-ref-1[1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.
For example, a person might say "I did not lie; I merely stretched the truth a little bit."cite-ref-little-blue-reasoning-book-2-0[2]
Contents
β’ Example
β’ See also
β’ References
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Form of the fallacy
β’ Claim X is made where the truth of the claim requires a distinct difference between A and B.
β’ There is no distinct difference between A and B.
β’ Therefore, claim X is incorrectly claimed to be true.
Example
In the following conversation:
β’ Sergio: There is no way I would ever even consider taking dancing lessons.
β’ Kitty: How about I ask my friend from work to teach you?
β’ Sergio: If you know someone who is willing to teach me how to dance, then I am willing to learn, sure.cite-ref-3[3]
Sergio's fallacy is thinking that being taught by someone is different than taking a lesson.
See also
References
cite-note-33. β citerefbennettBennett, Bo. "Distinction Without a Difference". logicallyfallacious.com.